By BARBARA ORTUTAY and PALLAVI GOGOI
NEW YORK– Facebook was supposed to soar. Instead, it plunged.
After the social network’s stock fizzled on Friday in its long-awaited debut, its stock fell 11 percent on Monday, even as the rest of the stock market rallied.
The downward spiral has left some people sitting on big losses, and others scratching their heads. After all, nothing fundamental has changed at Facebook in the days since the much-hyped company came to the stock market — Facebook still has more than 900 million users, its 28-year-old founder Mark Zuckerberg controls the company, and it is still one of the few profitable Internet companies to go public.
Facebook’s IPO –like Netscape’s in 1995 and Google’s in 2004– was billed as a milestone moment. Netscape’s offering ushered in the era of the Internet browser. The company’s stock more than doubled in its first day of trading. Google’s IPO heralded the age of search. It posted an 18 percent gain in its stock market debut. Facebook was supposed to offer proof that social media is a viable business and more than a passing fad.
But investors don’t seem convinced. Facebook’s stock closed Monday at US$34.03, down 11 percent from Friday’s closing price of US$38.23. The investment banks that arranged Facebook’s offering set a price of US$38 on Thursday. Although many investors had hoped for a big first-day pop, Facebook’s stock opened Friday at US$42.05 and fluctuated between US$45 and US$38 throughout the day.
For a host reasons, Facebook’s falling share price shouldn’t have been a surprise.
_Its IPO occurred the same week that the markets posted their worse performance so far in 2012. The Standard & Poor’s 500 index fell 4 percent.
_Meanwhile, Europe was trying to avert financial disaster.
_At the same time, the American public’s love affair with the stock market continued to wane. People have yanked over US$400 billion from U.S. stock mutual funds since 2008.
_Banks are being cautious too. All this is happening in the backdrop where banks are under pressure from regulators to become more conservative after the financial crisis. “Regulators want banks to take less risk,” said Larry Tabb, founder and CEO of Tabb Group, a markets research firm. “To support a US$100 billion offering can be challenging in this environment.”
_Investors were also spooked by the trading glitches at the Nasdaq stock market on Friday. Some people weren’t sure if their trades had been executed and trading of the stock was delayed by a half hour.
“It was like trying to get a jumbo jet to take off in turbulent weather,” said Kathleen Shelton Smith, principal of Renaissance Capital, IPO research. “It’s going to be a bumpy ride.”
With all of these factors in place on the day of Facebook’s IPO, some people may wonder why Facebook’s stock didn’t do worse.
The answer is: Facebook had some help. On Friday, Facebook only got as low as pennies above the offering price of US$38 per share but never fell below. The banks that arranged the IPO, the deals underwriters such as Morgan Stanley and others, put in enough “buy” orders at US$38 to keep the price from dropping below that level. It’s a customary gesture from underwriters to support the company they helped bring to market, explains Jay Ritter, a finance professor at the University of Florida. It’s a way to save face and show that the company and the bankers gauged an appropriate level of demand from investors and valued the company correctly.