Gay couples look to Obama gov’t on immigration rights

By Ivan Couronne, AFP

WASHINGTON — Erwin de Leon married a U.S. citizen nearly three years ago, but the Filipino is still in immigration limbo for one simple reason — his spouse is a man. De Leon and his husband John Beddingfield, the rector at an Episcopal church in Washington, were wed in the U.S. capital which, like nine states, has legalized same-sex marriages. But the federal government does not recognize such unions, so as far as it is concerned, the pair might as well be roommates. Now they are counting on President Barack Obama and his pledge to pursue immigration reform to obtain, finally, legal permanent residency for de Leon. “There’s still no security. The reality is I’m still seen as a foreign national, as a foreign student, even if I’ve been here for quite some time and I consider myself an American through and through,” said de Leon, who is 46. “I know a few people who came here in 1990, the same year, and have now been citizens for some time. “I know of people who came way after me who’ve become citizens. So it’s rather frustrating, because for me, I can’t wait for the day where I can be a full citizen and vote.” He and Beddingfield, 48, have been together for 14 years. They formalized their relationship with a domestic partnership in 2003, and were legally wed in April 2010, the month after Washington began allowing same-sex marriages. De Leon first came to the United States on a student visa to pursue his doctoral degree. He has repeatedly renewed various temporary visas and is looking for an employer to sponsor him for a residency permit. If he had married a woman, she could have sponsored him for a green card immediately, and within three to five years, for citizenship. However, for de Leon, his marriage to Beddingfield doesn’t exist for immigration purposes. Nevertheless de Leon says he sees “a light at the end of my tunnel.” In May 2012, Obama voiced support for same-sex marriage, giving gay couples hope they will gain the same immigration rights as heterosexual couples — as is the case in more than 20 countries including France, Germany and Britain. ‘Which is more important?’ The heart of the battle, however, lies beyond the president’s control.

In Congress, Democrats and Republicans are in negotiations over an ambitious overhaul of the immigration system, which could lead to a pathway to legal residency and even citizenship for some of the 11.5 million people currently living in the U.S. without papers.

A fragile consensus has formed around a basic principle: give papers to those who came to the U.S. as children and those who have never broken the law. But many Democrats and some Republicans also want reforms to include same-sex couples, including, under one proposal, to create an immigration category called “permanent partners.”