Visit from US President Obama lifts the lid on simmering tensions in Asia

11


By Huw Griffith ,AFP

By Huw Griffith TOKYO — U.S. President Barack Obama’s Asian tour which started in Japan on Wednesday has lifted the lid on a bubbling cauldron of regional animosities, exposing historical rifts that Washington can no longer paper over. Obama touches down in Tokyo a day after nearly 150 lawmakers paid homage at a shrine regarded by neighboring nations as a symbol of Japan’s brutal imperialist past, and shortly after the prime minister made an offering to the controversial site. In another sour note, China on the weekend seized a huge Japanese freighter over what a Shanghai court says are unpaid bills relating to Japan’s 1930’s occupation of vast swathes of the country. Lurking in the seas to the far southwest are coastguard boats — with armed naval vessels at the ready — playing out a volatile dispute between Tokyo and Beijing over ownership of a small chain of East China Sea islands. And to the west, an ever-unpredictable North Korea which has denounced the presidential tour as “reactionary and dangerous” appears to be trying to seize the spotlight with preparations for a fourth nuclear test. But despite the increasingly tense security situation and the need for unity, getting top regional allies South Korea — Obama’s next destination — and Japan to talk to each other is tricky. South Korean President Park Geun-Hye and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe have met just once since both came to power over a year ago, and only then when the U.S. leader cajoled them into a choreographed photo op. East Asia is a tumultuous region with a multitude of fractures that the U.S. has done little to mend over the last half century, said Christian Wirth, a research fellow at Griffith University in Australia. “Since the establishment of the postwar regime in San Francisco in 1951 and the onset of the Korean War in 1950, (the U.S. has been) directly and deeply involved in East Asian politics,” he told AFP. “Washington’s preference for bilateralism has contributed to the lack of intra-Asian cooperation and historical reconciliation.”