By Aaron Tam, AFP
HONG KONG–Hong Kong Wednesday announced new proposals for how the city should choose its next leader but made clear that candidates would still be screened �X the key issue behind more than two months of mass protests. More than 20 lawmakers carrying yellow umbrellas �X the symbol of the pro-democracy movement �X walked out of the legislative chamber as the consultation document was about to be presented by government number two Carrie Lam. They shouted ��I want universal suffrage�� as they left the chamber, forcing a brief adjournment.
The document �X posted online so that residents can give their views �X outlines options for how leadership candidates will be nominated and for the composition of the nominating committee, which democracy campaigners fear will be stacked with pro-Beijing figures. But Lam emphasized that the process would have to adhere to China’s ruling that candidates must be vetted. ��Any attempt to revoke the Beijing decision is unrealistic,�� she said. China has pledged that voters in Hong Kong can elect the city’s next chief executive in 2017 �X the first time there has ever been a public vote. But it insists that only two or three candidates can stand and that they will be vetted by a loyalist committee. That decision sparked demonstrations that brought tens of thousands onto the streets at their height, before protest camps were cleared in December. ‘Fake democracy’
The government has billed the reform process as ��historic�� and says that it wants to reflect the pluralistic nature of Hong Kong society in the vote for the next leader. But campaigners have branded it fake democracy. ��We call on the Hong Kong government not to waste time but relaunch the political reform process,�� Alan Leong of the pro-democracy Civic Party said after walking out of the legislature Wednesday. Leong had earlier been called a ��running dog�� �X a Chinese saying meaning traitor �X by pro-government protesters gathered outside the legislature waving a large Chinese flag.
Cyd Ho of the Labour Party added: ��We cannot accept a vote after vetting because it doesn’t offer real choices.��