WILMINGTON, Del. (AP) — The star prosecution witness in the trial of four Delaware inmates charged with murder, kidnapping and other crimes following a fatal prison riot last year played a key role in the disturbance and likely ordered the killing of a prison guard, a defense attorney claimed during opening statements Monday.
Attorney Jason Antoine also warned jurors that they will encounter a lot of inconsistencies during the trial, which could last up to four weeks, and that the prosecution’s case is based on “unreliable inmate information.”
Inmates at the James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, Delaware’s maximum-security prison, rioted Feb. 1 last year, killing prison guard Steven Floyd and taking three other staffers hostage. Two other prison guards were released by inmates after being beaten and tormented. A female counselor was held hostage for almost 20 hours before tactical teams burst through a wall with a backhoe and rescued her.
“The attack was vicious, it was tragically effective, and it was planned,” prosecutor Nichole Warner told jurors Monday before reciting a chronology of the riot, which she said broke out after Floyd called in prisoners from the recreation yard.
Floyd was immediately overcome by inmates, who stuffed him in a mop closet and repeatedly beat and stabbed him. Tactical responders found him handcuffed in his office, face down in about 2 inches of water. Warner said he died of multiple blunt trauma and stab wounds.
While investigators have been unable to pin down exactly when Floyd was killed, Warner indicated that fellow guard Joshua Wilkinson, who was taken hostage, heard Floyd being attacked several hours after the riot had begun.
“He heard Sergeant Floyd whimpering, he heard objects hitting a body,” she said. “And when the attack was over, he heard Sergeant Floyd moaning for a period of time. And then, he didn’t.”
The defendants say prosecutors have no evidence that they planned or participated in the riot, only unreliable testimony from other inmates trying to gain leniency or prison privileges.
“The only thing they’re willing to sacrifice is the innocence of others,” said inmate Wayne Staats, one of two defendants representing themselves. Staats described inmates who have agreed to testify for the prosecution as “opportunists.”
Jarreau Ayers, who also is representing himself, urged jurors to “question every single thing,” and to not feel pressured by society to return a guilty verdict in the closely watched case.
“At the end of the day, don’t allow the magnifying glass, or the light being so bright, to deter you all from doing what you think is right,” he said.
Antoine, representing Roman Shankaras, rejected Warner’s claim that his client was a “mastermind” behind the riot and “a shot caller.”
Antoine said Shankaras was expecting only that inmates would stage a peaceful demonstration to protest conditions at the prison, which an independent review conducted after the riot found to be understaffed, overcrowded and poorly managed.
“He didn’t sign up for murder…. All my client wanted was to be treated with dignity, and the proper way a prisoner should be treated,” Antoine said.
“It’s going to be garbage evidence in and garbage evidence out,” added Antoine, who suggested that the driving force behind the riot is Royal Downs, a former Baltimore gang leader and convicted killer who will be the state’s star witness.
Antoine described Downs, who avoided possible convictions on murder and kidnapping charges by pleading guilty to a single count of riot, as “one of the most dangerous and influential people” in Delaware’s prison system.
“He has the power to green-light people…. Green-light means take somebody out,” Antoine said. “He was the one, probably the one, who ordered the final hit on Floyd, and now he’s working for the state.”
“The scary thing is that Royal Downs could be walking the streets when this case is over,” Antoine added.
Attorney Benjamin Gifford, representing inmate Deric Forney, reminded jurors that the defendants are presumed innocent, and that the prosecution “has to tear down every reasonable doubt” before they can be convicted.
“One-hundred-twenty-six were in the building,” he noted. “That’s a lot of potential suspects.”