Where things stand in the Flint water crisis investigation

Where things stand in the Flint water crisis investigation
FILE--In this Thursday, Feb. 21, 2019, file photo, Solicitor General Fadwa Hammoud speaks during a press conference at the Frank Kelley Law Library in the Williams Building in Lansing, Mich. Authorities investigating Flint's water crisis have seized from storage the state-owned mobile devices of Snyder and 65 other current or former officials. Hammoud and Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy confirmed they executed a series of search warrants related to the criminal investigation of Flint's lead-contaminated water and a deadly outbreak of Legionnaires' disease. (Jake May/The Flint Journal via AP, File)

LANSING, Mich. (AP) — Questions abound after Michigan authorities executed search warrants in recent weeks to seize from government storage the state-owned mobile devices of former Gov. Rick Snyder, top aides and other government employees in a long-running criminal investigation of Flint’s water crisis.

The three-year probe of lead contamination in the city’s water supply and a deadly Legionnaires’ disease outbreak has led to charges against 15 people, including two members of Snyder’s Cabinet along with two state-appointed emergency managers effectively ran Flint due its financial troubles. Snyder, a Republican who left office in December due to term limits, apologized for the man-made disaster but was never charged.

A look at what the development may mean:


Michigan’s new attorney general, Democrat Dana Nessel, took office in January and named one of her appointees, Fadwa Hammoud, to take the lead on the Flint criminal cases, including the prosecution of former state health director Nick Lyon. Nessel criticized former Republican Attorney General Bill Schuette’s decision to hire an outside special prosecutor, Todd Flood, to handle the investigation. In April, her office sought a six-month timeout in Lyon’s case after finding a “trove of documents” related to Flint in a state building. A judge would later reject the request, but Flood was fired. Hammoud said it “became clear” that discovery was not fully and properly pursued from the onset. She pledged a “full accounting of all evidence.”


It is unclear whether the cellphones, computers and other devices of 67 current or former state workers will provide new or relevant evidence, but it is a sign that the investigation may be far from over. In 2016, for instance, data from the state-issued phones of Snyder and his top staffers was extracted and given to investigators, according to a document attached to one warrant. Snyder in total produced at least 38,000 documents, says a September 2018 letter written by one of his lawyers. The warrant seeks more devices and newer devices — including from Snyder — and names additional employees, particularly in the governor’s office, who left state government in December. A spokeswoman for Hammoud declined to say whether what was seized is new, old or to what extent it may never have been reviewed previously.


While Snyder declined to comment on the warrants, a May court filing reviewed by The Associated Press shows how his team likely views the step. Snyder and Flood were fighting as recently as September over his compliance with an investigative subpoena issued more than two years earlier. Snyder’s attorney at that time objected to a request to look at Snyder’s iPad, along with 24 iPads and 18 cellphones of current and former executive office employees, calling it an expensive, “arbitrary fishing expedition” and saying issues over document productions should have been raised long before. Charles Ash wrote that Snyder was cooperating in the probe but that reviewing the iPad would be largely duplicative since Snyder’s email and iPhone had been examined. He said the office had previously produced the cellphones of Snyder and 12 key aides. Snyder also objected to collecting data from the personal emails of his children, searching his employees’ personal emails and providing their personal cellphones, which his lawyer said were outside his custody and control.


Peter Henning, a professor at Wayne State University Law School, said he suspects the attorney general’s office is being “extra careful” by using warrants to obtain the devices instead of subpoenas. “They want to make sure that they don’t lose any evidence that they might discover,” he said, citing the risk of it being suppressed before trial and the importance of using a warrant to search a phone or computer. “They are making sure to dot every I and cross every T. It’s more difficult to get a search warrant but it gives you the prosecutor much greater protection.”


It is not clear if more charges are coming in the Flint probe or if the warrants are instead primarily related to existing cases. Hammoud said earlier this year that it was “premature” to say. In 2017, Schuette — the attorney general who launched the investigation — signaled that it was moving to the trial phase and that Snyder would not be charged. “The people of Flint deserve for us to take our time in terms of evaluating every piece of evidence,” Hammoud said. “We will be looking at every single person that has been charged and any potential person that may be charged.”


Follow Eggert on Twitter at https://twitter.com/DavidEggert00